May v. Crounse

598 So. 2d 303, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5954, 1992 WL 104646
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 1992·No. No. 91-1323·Published

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The summary judgment entered below is affirmed on the principle that a landowner is under no duty to keep an abutting sidewalk free of accumulated leaves, sap, algae or any other natural obstruction. Strong v. Richfield Agency, Inc., 460 N.W.2d 106 (Minn.App.1990); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 349 (1965); see Sullivan v. Silver Palm Properties, Inc., 558 So.2d 409 (Fla.1990); Gallo v. Heller, 512 So.2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Richmond v. General Engineering Enters., 454 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Ponte v. DaSilva, 388 Mass. 1008, 446 N.E.2d 77 (1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

May v. Crounse, 598 So. 2d 303, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5954, 1992 WL 104646 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

598 So. 2d 303 (May v. Crounse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richmond v. GEN. ENG'G ENTERPRISES CO.
454 So. 2d 16 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Gallo v. Heller
512 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Strong v. Richfield State Agency, Inc.
460 N.W.2d 106 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1990)
Ponte v. DaSilva
388 Mass. 1008 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1983)