May v. Crounse
This text of 598 So. 2d 303 (May v. Crounse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The summary judgment entered below is affirmed on the principle that a landowner is under no duty to keep an abutting sidewalk free of accumulated leaves, sap, algae or any other natural obstruction. Strong v. Richfield Agency, Inc., 460 N.W.2d 106 (Minn.App.1990); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 349 (1965); see Sullivan v. Silver Palm Properties, Inc., 558 So.2d 409 (Fla.1990); Gallo v. Heller, 512 So.2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Richmond v. General Engineering Enters., 454 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Ponte v. DaSilva, 388 Mass. 1008, 446 N.E.2d 77 (1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
598 So. 2d 303, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5954, 1992 WL 104646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-crounse-fladistctapp-1992.