May v. Aarsand Management, LLC
This text of 328 F. App'x 877 (May v. Aarsand Management, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William May appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment on May’s claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 (2006) and reconsideration thereof. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. May v. Aarsand Mgmt., LLC, No. 1:06-cv-00221-AMD (D. Md. July 28, 2008; Aug. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-aarsand-management-llc-ca4-2009.