May v. Aarsand Management, LLC

Fourth Circuit

May v. Aarsand Management, LLC

328 F. App'x 877

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2009·No. No. 08-2022·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William May appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment on May’s claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 (2006) and reconsideration thereof. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. May v. Aarsand Mgmt., LLC, No. 1:06-cv-00221-AMD (D. Md. July 28, 2008; Aug. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William May appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment on May’s claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 (2006) and reconsideration thereof. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. May v. Aarsand Mgmt., LLC, No. 1:06-cv-00221-AMD (D. Md. July 28, 2008; Aug. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

May v. Aarsand Management, LLC, 328 F. App'x 877 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

328 F. App'x 877 (May v. Aarsand Management, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related