May Stores Seventy-Four Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

895 N.E.2d 562, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1498
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 24, 2008·No. 2008-1374·Published

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2005-Z-744 and 2005-Z-830. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of the agreed motion of the parties to remand this appeal in order to implement a settlement,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to implement the settlement agreement of the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

May Stores Seventy-Four Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 895 N.E.2d 562, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1498 (Ohio 2008).

895 N.E.2d 562 (May Stores Seventy-Four Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.