May Department Stores Co. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 455
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in May Department Stores Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 Cust. Ct. 373 →
United States Customs Court·Decided May 1, 1961·No. No. 65552; protests 186263-K, 194745-K, and 219971-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
May Department Stores Co. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 455 (cusc 1961).
46 Cust. Ct. 455 (May Department Stores Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)