May Coal Co. v. Robinette

7 Ohio Law. Abs. 173
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 6, 1929
DocketNo 21334
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Ohio Law. Abs. 173 (May Coal Co. v. Robinette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
May Coal Co. v. Robinette, 7 Ohio Law. Abs. 173 (Ohio 1929).

Opinion

Syllabus by

ALLEN, J.

DECEDENTS’ ESTATES-Actions (10 B)

(220 E) Sections 10770 and 10772, General Code, give an independent right of action for benefit of the persons named in Section 10772, where death has resulted from the injuries, to recover for such pecuniary injury resulting from such death, where such right arises fronj an act. neglect or [174]*174default, such] as would have entitled such person to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof, if death had not ensued.

2. The two actions, although prosecuted by the same personal representative, are not in the same right, and hence a judgment for the defendant in one case is not a bar to a recovery in the other.

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Ohio Law. Abs. 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-coal-co-v-robinette-ohio-1929.