May Co. v. United States

18 Cust. Ct. 377, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 477
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1947
DocketNo. 6855; Entry No. 390, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Cust. Ct. 377 (May Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
May Co. v. United States, 18 Cust. Ct. 377, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 477 (cusc 1947).

Opinion

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and ehinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

• Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Cust. Ct. 377, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-co-v-united-states-cusc-1947.