May Chen v. Metropolitan Police Department
This text of May Chen v. Metropolitan Police Department (May Chen v. Metropolitan Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-7011 September Term, 2022 1:22-cv-00693-UNA Filed On: May 23, 2023 May Chen,
Appellant
v.
Metropolitan Police Department, et al.,
Appellees
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Wilkins and Katsas, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and the motion for entry of judgment and the supplement thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion for entry of judgment be denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s December 16, 2022 order be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for relief from judgment. See Smalls v. United States, 471 F.3d 186, 191 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (district court’s denial of relief under Rule 60(b) reviewed for abuse of discretion); United States v. Civ. Aeronautics Bd., 510 F.2d 769, 773 (D.C. Cir. 1975) (same, for denial of relief under Rule 60(a)). Entry of default or default judgment was not warranted where the case was dismissed before the defendants were served. See Keegel v. Key W. & Caribbean Trading Co., 627 F.2d 372, 374 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (“No obligation to answer arose until after service was effected.”). United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-7011 September Term, 2022
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk
Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
May Chen v. Metropolitan Police Department, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-chen-v-metropolitan-police-department-cadc-2023.