Maxxim Medical, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Maxxim Medical, Inc. v. Tracy

666 N.E.2d 1140, 76 Ohio St. 3d 1201

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 24, 1996

DocketNo. 95-2447

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 666 N.E.2d 1140 (Maxxim Medical, Inc. v. Tracy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maxxim Medical, Inc. v. Tracy, 666 N.E.2d 1140, 76 Ohio St. 3d 1201 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under Kempf Surgical Appliances, Inc. v. Tracy, we grant Maxxim’s motion to remand this matter to the BTA for it to rule on whether the equipment supplements impaired functions of the human body or aids human perambulation. We note that Maxxim had conceded that this equipment does not support weakened or non-functioning parts of the human body.

Furthermore, we reserve judgment on whether R.C. 4121.44(F) relieves Maxxim from collecting the sales tax when the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation pays for the equipment for Maxxim’s customers.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI