MAXWELL'S v. Levy

2 U.S. 381, 1 L. Ed. 424, 16 F. Cas. 1195, 2 Dall. 381, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 219
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 1, 1797·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

2 U.S. 381 (____)
2 Dall. 381

MAXWELL'S Lessee
versus
LEVY.

Supreme Court of United States.

After argument by M. Levy, for the plaintiff, and by W. Tilghman, for the defendant, IREDELL, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which the conveyance to the lessor of the plaintiff was considered as entirely colorable and collusive; and, therefore, incapable of laying a foundation for the jurisdiction of the Court.

The rule made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MAXWELL'S v. Levy, 2 U.S. 381, 1 L. Ed. 424, 16 F. Cas. 1195, 2 Dall. 381, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 219 (1797).

2 U.S. 381 (MAXWELL'S v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peterson v. Sucro
93 F.2d 878 (Fourth Circuit, 1938)
Lake County Commissioners v. Dudley
173 U.S. 243 (Supreme Court, 1899)
Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Kelly
160 U.S. 327 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Farmington v. Pillsbury
114 U.S. 138 (Supreme Court, 1885)
Griffith v. Clute
9 N.J.L. 265 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1827)