MAXWELL'S v. Levy
2 U.S. 381, 1 L. Ed. 424, 16 F. Cas. 1195, 2 Dall. 381, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 219
This text of 2 U.S. 381 (MAXWELL'S v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MAXWELL'S v. Levy, 2 U.S. 381, 1 L. Ed. 424, 16 F. Cas. 1195, 2 Dall. 381, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 219 (1797).
Opinion
MAXWELL'S Lessee
versus
LEVY.
Supreme Court of United States.
After argument by M. Levy, for the plaintiff, and by W. Tilghman, for the defendant, IREDELL, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which the conveyance to the lessor of the plaintiff was considered as entirely colorable and collusive; and, therefore, incapable of laying a foundation for the jurisdiction of the Court.
The rule made absolute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Peterson v. Sucro
93 F.2d 878 (Fourth Circuit, 1938)
Lake County Commissioners v. Dudley
173 U.S. 243 (Supreme Court, 1899)
Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Kelly
160 U.S. 327 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Farmington v. Pillsbury
114 U.S. 138 (Supreme Court, 1885)
Griffith v. Clute
9 N.J.L. 265 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1827)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 U.S. 381, 1 L. Ed. 424, 16 F. Cas. 1195, 2 Dall. 381, 1797 U.S. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwells-v-levy-scotus-1797.