Maxwell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2010·No. 10-7098·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7098

LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01483-BEL)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal

Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (2006), and Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Maxwell v. United States, No. 1:10-cv-01483-BEL

(D. Md. June 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maxwell v. United States, (4th Cir. 2010).

Maxwell v. United States (Maxwell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related