Maxwell v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7098
LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01483-BEL)
Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lloyd George Maxwell appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal
Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (2006), and Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Maxwell v. United States, No. 1:10-cv-01483-BEL
(D. Md. June 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maxwell v. United States (Maxwell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.