Maxwell v. United States
This text of Maxwell v. United States (Maxwell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6193
LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, SR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-262-A)
Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 31, 2003
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for modification and reduction of his sentence.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Maxwell v. United States, No. CR-93-262-A (E.D. Va.
Jan. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maxwell v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-united-states-ca4-2003.