Maxwell v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Maxwell v. United States

60 F. App'x 468

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2003·No. No. 03-6193·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification and reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and [469] find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Maxwell v. United States, No. CR-93-262-A (E.D.Va. Jan. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification and reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and [469] find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Maxwell v. United States, No. CR-93-262-A (E.D.Va. Jan. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Maxwell v. United States, 60 F. App'x 468 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

60 F. App'x 468 (Maxwell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.