Maxwell v. State

38 Tex. 171
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 Tex. 171 (Maxwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maxwell v. State, 38 Tex. 171 (Tex. 1873).

Opinion

Ogden, J.

The appeal in this case must be dismissed! for the want of a sufficient recognizance.

By the terms of the recognizance the defendant is not [173]*173bound to appear before any particular court, or at any particular place, to abide the judgment and decision of the Supreme Court. A recognizance so defective is wholly insufficient to give this court jurisdiction of the «case. It is a matter of no little astonishment that the •clerk and officers of the courts, who have, or should have, the statute before them, where a form for such a record is prescribed, should so fatally vary from the requirement of the statute. The appeal is dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. State
2 Tex. Ct. App. 26 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Tex. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-state-tex-1873.