Maxwell v. State
This text of 38 Tex. 171 (Maxwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal in this case must be dismissed! for the want of a sufficient recognizance.
By the terms of the recognizance the defendant is not [173]*173bound to appear before any particular court, or at any particular place, to abide the judgment and decision of the Supreme Court. A recognizance so defective is wholly insufficient to give this court jurisdiction of the «case. It is a matter of no little astonishment that the •clerk and officers of the courts, who have, or should have, the statute before them, where a form for such a record is prescribed, should so fatally vary from the requirement of the statute. The appeal is dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 Tex. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-state-tex-1873.