Maxwell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Maxwell v. State

458 S.W.2d 642, 3 Tenn. Crim. App. 182, 1970 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 382

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

DecidedJuly 9, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 S.W.2d 642 (Maxwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maxwell v. State, 458 S.W.2d 642, 3 Tenn. Crim. App. 182, 1970 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 382 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

WALKER, Presiding Judge.

Without an evidentiary hearing, the trial judge sustained a motion to strike Maxwell’s petition for habeas corpus. He alleged that before his trial in Shelby County [183]*183he petitioned the trial court for a speedy trial and it was denied; that he was later tried and convicted.

The record shows that the trial court dismissed his motion for a speedy trial after a full hearing on June 28, 1967. With two codefendants, he was tried and convicted on October 16, 1967. Following his conviction, he appealed to this court and we affirmed the conviction. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. See Maxwell v. State, Tenn.Cr.App., 441 S.W.2d 503.

T.C.A. § 40-3811 provides that the scope of the hearing in a post-conviction case shall extend to all grounds the petitioner may have, except those grounds which the court finds should be excluded because they have been previously determined. If a court of competent jurisdiction has ruled on the merits after a full and fair hearing, a ground for relief is previously determined. See T.C.A. § 40-3812. That has been done here.

The trial judge properly held that this question was previously determined. His judgment in dismissing the petition is affirmed.

HYDER and RUSSELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI