Maxwell v. State

243 S.W.3d 538, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 116, 2008 WL 170382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maxwell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1390
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 2008·No. No. ED 89079·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Dominic Maxwell, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maxwell v. State, 243 S.W.3d 538, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 116, 2008 WL 170382 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

243 S.W.3d 538 (Maxwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.