Maxwell v. State
895 So. 2d 1171, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1613, 2005 WL 357024
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 16, 2005
DocketNo. 3D05-45
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 895 So. 2d 1171 (Maxwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maxwell v. State, 895 So. 2d 1171, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1613, 2005 WL 357024 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
Opinion
Affirmed.
Appellant, Jerome Maxwell, appeals the denial of his Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence pursuant to Rule 3.800, Fla. R.Crim. P. We affirm. See Burgal v. State, 888 So.2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Herrera v. Herrera
895 So. 2d 1171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
895 So. 2d 1171, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1613, 2005 WL 357024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.