Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Maxwell v. State

Maxwell v. State

766 So. 2d 391, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10077, 2000 WL 1109040
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 2000·No. No. 1D99-3812·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant’s motion for continuance in the trial court did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal. See Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (only authorized motions for rehearings toll time for filing notice of appeal); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h).

BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH, and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maxwell v. State, 766 So. 2d 391, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10077, 2000 WL 1109040 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

766 So. 2d 391 (Maxwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffis v. State
593 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)