Maxwell v. State
766 So. 2d 391, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10077, 2000 WL 1109040
This text of 766 So. 2d 391 (Maxwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maxwell v. State, 766 So. 2d 391, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10077, 2000 WL 1109040 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
This case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant’s motion for continuance in the trial court did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal. See Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (only authorized motions for rehearings toll time for filing notice of appeal); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Griffis v. State
593 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
766 So. 2d 391, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10077, 2000 WL 1109040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.