Maxwell v. State

645 So. 2d 572, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11157, 1994 WL 645790
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 18, 1994
DocketNo. 94-35
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 645 So. 2d 572 (Maxwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maxwell v. State, 645 So. 2d 572, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11157, 1994 WL 645790 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We vacate the habitual offender sentence imposed in this case and remand this cause for resentencing. See Santoro v. State, 644 So.2d 585 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Thompson v. [573]*573State, 638 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also Cole v. State, 640 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Sentence VACATED; cause REMANDED.

PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Maxwell
657 So. 2d 1158 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
645 So. 2d 572, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11157, 1994 WL 645790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.