Maxwell v. Rucker
This text of 56 S.E. 91 (Maxwell v. Rucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(After stating the facts.)
2. The claimant was the wife of the defendant in fi. fa. The evidence authorized a conclusion that the husband paid for the property levied on, hut directed a conveyance to be made to the wife after the plaintiff commenced the suit which eventuated in the judgment upon which the fi. fa. was issued; and that at the time he caused this conveyance to be made to his wife, he had no property other than his interest in the land so combed. The verdict finding the property subject to the fi. fa. was therefore supported by the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 S.E. 91, 127 Ga. 111, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-rucker-ga-1906.