Maxwell v. Leichtman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Maxwell v. Leichtman

71 A. 1134, 75 N.J. Eq. 294, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 297

DecidedNovember 20, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A. 1134 (Maxwell v. Leichtman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maxwell v. Leichtman, 71 A. 1134, 75 N.J. Eq. 294, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 297 (N.J. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order allowing to the complainants in an interpleader suit their costs and a counsel fee of $50, to be paid out of the fund deposited by the complainants in court.

No sufficient reason being shown why this allowance should not be made, the order under review will be affirmed, with costs.

[295]*295For affirmance—The Chancellor, Ctiiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, ATredenburgh, AAroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order allowing to the complainants in an interpleader suit their costs and a counsel fee of $50, to be paid out of the fund deposited by the complainants in court.

No sufficient reason being shown why this allowance should not be made, the order under review will be affirmed, with costs.

[295]*295For affirmance—The Chancellor, Ctiiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, ATredenburgh, AAroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16. For reversal—None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A. 1134, 75 N.J. Eq. 294, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-leichtman-nj-1908.