Maxwell v. Kristensen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maxwell v. Kristensen

9 A.D.2d 919, 195 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5505

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 A.D.2d 919 (Maxwell v. Kristensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maxwell v. Kristensen, 9 A.D.2d 919, 195 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment, entered after trial, dismissing the complaint in an action by taxpayers for a judgment (1) declaring that the sale of a parcel of real property by the respondent city to the respondent Vioe Realty Corp, is void and unlawful, (2) declaring that the city may not sell the parcel except in the manner provided for in paragraph b of subdivision, 2 of section 23 of the General City Law and in section 37 of the Second Class Cities Law, and (3) enjoining the completion of the sale. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.; Murphy, J., deceased. [15 Mise 2d 875.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment, entered after trial, dismissing the complaint in an action by taxpayers for a judgment (1) declaring that the sale of a parcel of real property by the respondent city to the respondent Vioe Realty Corp, is void and unlawful, (2) declaring that the city may not sell the parcel except in the manner provided for in paragraph b of subdivision, 2 of section 23 of the General City Law and in section 37 of the Second Class Cities Law, and (3) enjoining the completion of the sale. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.; Murphy, J., deceased. [15 Mise 2d 875.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 919, 195 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-kristensen-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack