Maxwell v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

66 So. 3d 1093, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12907, 2011 WL 3586141
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 17, 2011
DocketNo. 3D11-1560
StatusPublished

This text of 66 So. 3d 1093 (Maxwell v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maxwell v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 66 So. 3d 1093, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12907, 2011 WL 3586141 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal as untimely. As in Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), our dismissal is without prejudice. Maritza Maxwell is free to ask the Unemployment Appeals Commission to vacate and re-enter the operative order. If the Commission cooperates, then Maxwell may timely appeal the re-entered order. If not, then she may [1094]*1094appeal the Commission’s refusal to re-enter the order.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp.
721 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 So. 3d 1093, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12907, 2011 WL 3586141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2011.