Maxwell v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

66 So. 3d 1093, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12907, 2011 WL 3586141
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 2011·No. No. 3D11-1560·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal as untimely. As in Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), our dismissal is without prejudice. Maritza Maxwell is free to ask the Unemployment Appeals Commission to vacate and re-enter the operative order. If the Commission cooperates, then Maxwell may timely appeal the re-entered order. If not, then she may [1094]*1094appeal the Commission’s refusal to re-enter the order.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maxwell v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 66 So. 3d 1093, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12907, 2011 WL 3586141 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

66 So. 3d 1093 (Maxwell v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp.
721 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)