Maxwell v. DAK Americas
This text of Maxwell v. DAK Americas (Maxwell v. DAK Americas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1068
CARL LESTER MAXWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAK AMERICAS; MUNDY MAINTENANCE SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00141-DCN)
Submitted: January 8, 2007 Decided: February 13, 2007
Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chalmers C. Johnson, CHALMERS JOHNSON LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Stacy K. Wood, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina; Benjamin Weaver Glass, III, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Carl Lester Maxwell appeals the district court’s opinion
and order granting summary judgment to DAK Americas and Mundy
Maintenance Services and dismissing his breach of employment
contract claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Maxwell v. DAK Americas, No. 2:05-cv-00141-DCN
(D.S.C. Dec. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maxwell v. DAK Americas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-dak-americas-ca4-2007.