Maxwell v. County of Monroe
This text of 264 A.D. 820 (Maxwell v. County of Monroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: It is our view that, in order to allege a good cause of action, plaintiff is not required to negative the facts which would constitute a good defense. It is the duty of defendant to plead facts which will show that it was exercising a governmental function. (Engels v. City of New York, 168 Misc. 753; affd., 256 App. Div. 992; affd., 281 N. Y. 650.) The cases relied upon by defendant, such as Nichitta v. City of New York (223 App. Div. 428; affd., 250 N. Y. 530), are distinguishable. Those cases went to trial, and the defense of governmental function was established. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 820, 35 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-county-of-monroe-nyappdiv-1942.