Maxwell v. Clarke
This text of 29 N.E. 224 (Maxwell v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question whether the defendants owe the plaintiff the amount of the notes in suit was not adjudicated against- the plaintiff in the former suits in equity between these parties. In those suits it was admitted or proved that the plaintiff was a creditor of the defendants, and the bills were dismissed upon the ground that, although a creditor, he could not by such a bill in equity, which is in the nature of an equitable attachment, obtain a lien upon property of the debtor acquired after his insolvency, before such creditor had obtained a [115]*115judgment at law upon his debt. The records show that this was the ground for dismissing the bills. The decrees in those suits, therefore, are not a bar to this action. Maxwell v. Cochran, 136 Mass. 73. Exceptions overruled,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 N.E. 224, 139 Mass. 112, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-clarke-mass-1885.