Maxwell v. Clarke

Fourth Circuit

Maxwell v. Clarke

540 F. App'x 196

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 27, 2013·No. No. 13-7056·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUI-PA”). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Clarke, No. 7:12-cv-00477-JLK-RSB, 2013 WL 2902833 (W.D.Va. June 13, 2013). We deny Maxwell’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUI-PA”). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Clarke, No. 7:12-cv-00477-JLK-RSB, 2013 WL 2902833 (W.D.Va. June 13, 2013). We deny Maxwell’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Maxwell v. Clarke, 540 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

540 F. App'x 196 (Maxwell v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related