Maxwell v. Bishop

393 U.S. 997, 89 S. Ct. 488
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 16, 1968
DocketNo. 622
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 393 U.S. 997 (Maxwell v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maxwell v. Bishop, 393 U.S. 997, 89 S. Ct. 488 (1968).

Opinion

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 2 and 3 of the petition which read as follows:

“2. Whether Arkansas’ practice of permitting the trial jury absolute discretion, uncontrolled by standards or directions of any kind, to impose the death penalty violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
“3. Whether Arkansas’ single-verdict procedure, which requires the jury to determine guilt and punishment simultaneously and a defendant to choose between presenting mitigating evidence on the punishment issue or maintaining his privilege against self-incrimination on [998]*998the guilt issue, violates the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?”
Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, Michael Melts-ner, George Howard, Jr., and Anthony G. Amsterdam for petitioner. Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Don Langston, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

Case set for oral argument immediately following No. 642 [Boykin v. Alabama, ante, p. 820].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGautha v. California
402 U.S. 183 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Duisen v. State
441 S.W.2d 688 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1969)
Modesto v. Nelson
296 F. Supp. 1375 (N.D. California, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
393 U.S. 997, 89 S. Ct. 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-v-bishop-scotus-1968.