Maxwell v. Bishop

393 U.S. 997, 89 S. Ct. 488
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 16, 1968·No. No. 622·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 2 and 3 of the petition which read as follows:

“2. Whether Arkansas’ practice of permitting the trial jury absolute discretion, uncontrolled by standards or directions of any kind, to impose the death penalty violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
“3. Whether Arkansas’ single-verdict procedure, which requires the jury to determine guilt and punishment simultaneously and a defendant to choose between presenting mitigating evidence on the punishment issue or maintaining his privilege against self-incrimination on [998] the guilt issue, violates the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments?”
Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, Michael Melts-ner, George Howard, Jr., and Anthony G. Amsterdam for petitioner. Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Don Langston, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

Case set for oral argument immediately following No. 642 [Boykin v. Alabama, ante, p. 820].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maxwell v. Bishop, 393 U.S. 997, 89 S. Ct. 488 (1968).

393 U.S. 997 (Maxwell v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGautha v. California
402 U.S. 183 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Duisen v. State
441 S.W.2d 688 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1969)
Modesto v. Nelson
296 F. Supp. 1375 (N.D. California, 1969)