Maxwell Tillman Cohen v. Jacob Henry Rodenbaugh, Individually and Trading as Minisink Hills Stables

Third Circuit

Maxwell Tillman Cohen v. Jacob Henry Rodenbaugh, Individually and Trading as Minisink Hills Stables

255 F.2d 105, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 1958

Docket12467

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 F.2d 105 (Maxwell Tillman Cohen v. Jacob Henry Rodenbaugh, Individually and Trading as Minisink Hills Stables) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maxwell Tillman Cohen v. Jacob Henry Rodenbaugh, Individually and Trading as Minisink Hills Stables, 255 F.2d 105, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166 (3d Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity suit brought by the plaintiff for injuries sustained from a kick by a horse which the defendant had rented to him the trial judge at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the undisputed evidence established the plaintiff’s contributory negligence. Subsequently the court denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, holding that the evidence failed to establish negligence on the part of the defendant. We have examined the evidence and are not able to say that either of these rulings is clearly erroneous.

The judgment of the district court will accordingly be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity suit brought by the plaintiff for injuries sustained from a kick by a horse which the defendant had rented to him the trial judge at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the undisputed evidence established the plaintiff’s contributory negligence. Subsequently the court denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, holding that the evidence failed to establish negligence on the part of the defendant. We have examined the evidence and are not able to say that either of these rulings is clearly erroneous.

The judgment of the district court will accordingly be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 F.2d 105, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-tillman-cohen-v-jacob-henry-rodenbaugh-individually-and-trading-ca3-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack