Maxwell Technologies, Inc. v. Nesscap, Inc.
This text of 331 F. App'x 745 (Maxwell Technologies, Inc. v. Nesscap, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
The court having received no response to its March 19, 2009 order,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion to vacate the preliminary injunction is denied and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California so that the district court may consider [746]*746whether to vacate the preliminary injunction, due to settlement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 F. App'x 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-technologies-inc-v-nesscap-inc-cafc-2009.