Maxwell Technologies, Inc. v. Nesscap, Inc.
331 F. App'x 745
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
The court having received no response to its March 19, 2009 order,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion to vacate the preliminary injunction is denied and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California so that the district court may consider [746] whether to vacate the preliminary injunction, due to settlement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maxwell Technologies, Inc. v. Nesscap, Inc., 331 F. App'x 745 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
331 F. App'x 745 (Maxwell Technologies, Inc. v. Nesscap, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.