Maxwell Steel Co. v. Maxwell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Maxwell Steel Co. v. Maxwell

225 S.W.2d 992, 1949 Tex. App. LEXIS 2346

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 2, 1949

DocketNo. 15076

StatusPublished

This text of 225 S.W.2d 992 (Maxwell Steel Co. v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maxwell Steel Co. v. Maxwell, 225 S.W.2d 992, 1949 Tex. App. LEXIS 2346 (Tex. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, Justice.

This appeal is a companion case to Maxwell & Co. v. Maxwell, our No. 15075, this day decided by this Court and reported in 225 S.W.2d 988. The petitions were identical except as to the corporate names of the two appellants and the property involved. The two cases were tried upon the same testimony in the trial court at a single hearing. Separate appeal bonds were made and duplicate records were filed in this Court. The same points of error are presented in each and duplicate briefs were filed and the appeals were submitted together.

What we have said in the original and concurring opinions in No. 15075 is applicable to this appeal and need not be repeated. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court in this case, as we did in No. 15075.

SPEER, J., concurring. McDONALD, C. J., disqualified and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Justice.

This appeal is a companion case to Maxwell & Co. v. Maxwell, our No. 15075, this day decided by this Court and reported in 225 S.W.2d 988. The petitions were identical except as to the corporate names of the two appellants and the property involved. The two cases were tried upon the same testimony in the trial court at a single hearing. Separate appeal bonds were made and duplicate records were filed in this Court. The same points of error are presented in each and duplicate briefs were filed and the appeals were submitted together.

What we have said in the original and concurring opinions in No. 15075 is applicable to this appeal and need not be repeated. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court in this case, as we did in No. 15075.

SPEER, J., concurring. McDONALD, C. J., disqualified and not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 S.W.2d 992, 1949 Tex. App. LEXIS 2346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxwell-steel-co-v-maxwell-texapp-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack