Maxwell-McClure-Fitts Dry Goods Co. v. Woodruff
132 P. 1008, 90 Kan. 448, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 238
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maxwell-McClure-Fitts Dry Goods Co. v. Woodruff. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 Kan. 821 →
Opinion
This is an appeal by Ragsdale from a decision overruling his motion for a new trial and to tax the costs of the receivership to the plaintiffs. It was submitted, together with cause number 18,272, in which an opinion revérsing the judgment of the district court was handed down June 7, 1913. (Dry Goods Co. v. Woodruff, 89 Kan. 821, 132 Pac. 1005.)
(See, also, Ellis v. Woodruff, 88 Kan. 734, 129 Pac. 1193.)
The judgment in this case will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maxwell-McClure-Fitts Dry Goods Co. v. Woodruff, 132 P. 1008, 90 Kan. 448, 1913 Kan. LEXIS 238 (kan 1913).
132 P. 1008 (Maxwell-McClure-Fitts Dry Goods Co. v. Woodruff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellis v. Woodruff
129 P. 1193 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1913)
Maxwell-McClure-Fitts Dry Goods Co. v. Woodruff
132 P. 1005 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1913)