Maxson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maxson v. State

513 So. 2d 263, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2381, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10467

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 7, 1987

DocketNo. 4-86-2942

StatusPublished

This text of 513 So. 2d 263 (Maxson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maxson v. State, 513 So. 2d 263, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2381, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10467 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the sentence and remand to the trial court for the following remedial action: (1) Correct written sentencing order to reflect that the twelve-year prison term imposed in Case No. 86-9422 has been modified to a term of probation in accordance with the trial court’s oral pronouncement; (2) Resentence appellant with requisite adherence to the provisions of section 39.-111(7), Florida Statutes (Supp.1986), which requires written documentation of the consideration of Chapter 39 criteria and the factual reasons which support the decision to impose adult sanctions; (3) Correct sentencing in Case No. 86-9041 to reflect the proper term of probation applicable to each count for which sentence was imposed.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the sentence and remand to the trial court for the following remedial action: (1) Correct written sentencing order to reflect that the twelve-year prison term imposed in Case No. 86-9422 has been modified to a term of probation in accordance with the trial court’s oral pronouncement; (2) Resentence appellant with requisite adherence to the provisions of section 39.-111(7), Florida Statutes (Supp.1986), which requires written documentation of the consideration of Chapter 39 criteria and the factual reasons which support the decision to impose adult sanctions; (3) Correct sentencing in Case No. 86-9041 to reflect the proper term of probation applicable to each count for which sentence was imposed.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

513 So. 2d 263, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2381, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxson-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.