Maxon v. State
This text of 2015 ND 116 (Maxon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 5/27/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 116
Cole Milo Maxon, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20140314
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
Cole Milo Maxon, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20140473
Appeals from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, N.D. 58106, for appellant; submitted on brief.
Allen M. Koppy, State’s Attorney, 210 Second Avenue NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for appellee; submitted on brief.
Maxon v. State
State v. Maxon
[¶1] Cole Maxon appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief entered after an evidentiary hearing and from a judgment resentencing him for possession of a controlled substance. He argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel when he pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 ND 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxon-v-state-nd-2015.