Maxine Y. White v. William Smith Kirk

948 F.2d 1284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31886, 1991 WL 240474
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 20, 1991·No. 91-6625·Unpublished

Opinion

948 F.2d 1284

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Maxine Y. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William Smith KIRK, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-6625.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 28, 1991.
Decided Nov. 20, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-91-281-CRT-BR)

Maxine Y. White, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Maxine Y. White appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that there was no abuse of discretion and this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Kirk, No. CA-91-281-CRTBR (E.D.N.C. July 15, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maxine Y. White v. William Smith Kirk, 948 F.2d 1284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31886, 1991 WL 240474 (4th Cir. 1991).

948 F.2d 1284 (Maxine Y. White v. William Smith Kirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related