Maxine Y. White v. William Smith Kirk
This text of 948 F.2d 1284 (Maxine Y. White v. William Smith Kirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Maxine Y. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William Smith KIRK, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-6625.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 28, 1991.
Decided Nov. 20, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-91-281-CRT-BR)
Maxine Y. White, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Maxine Y. White appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that there was no abuse of discretion and this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Kirk, No. CA-91-281-CRTBR (E.D.N.C. July 15, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
948 F.2d 1284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31886, 1991 WL 240474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxine-y-white-v-william-smith-kirk-ca4-1991.