Maxine C. Valenzuela v. State
This text of Maxine C. Valenzuela v. State (Maxine C. Valenzuela v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00635-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
MAXINE C. VALENZUELA, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Maxine C. Valenzuela, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion
to dismiss her appeal because she no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss
pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,
and our mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 17th day of March, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maxine C. Valenzuela v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxine-c-valenzuela-v-state-texapp-2011.