Maxine C. Valenzuela v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 17, 2011·No. 13-10-00635-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-10-00635-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

MAXINE C. VALENZUELA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Maxine C. Valenzuela, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion

to dismiss her appeal because she no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 17th day of March, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maxine C. Valenzuela v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Maxine C. Valenzuela v. State (Maxine C. Valenzuela v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.