Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Christopher Prine

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 9, 2016·No. 04-16-00327-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 9, 2016

No. 04-16-00327-CV

Maxine ADAMS and Cecil Adams, Appellants

v.

Christopher PRINE, Appellee

From the 269th District Court, Harris County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014-35653-a Honorable Dan Hinde, Judge Presiding

ORDER In civil cases, rule 34.5(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires the clerk’s record to include “all pleadings on which the trial was held.” TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(a)(1). The final judgment signed in the above-referenced case states the trial court considered “Prine’s Motion to Enter Final Judgment;” therefore, that motion is one of the “pleadings on which the trial was held.” Id. However, the motion was not included in the clerk’s record filed in this appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk file a supplemental clerk’s record containing “Prine’s Motion to Enter Final Judgment” no later than ten days from the date of this order.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 9th day of December, 2016.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Christopher Prine, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Christopher Prine (Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Christopher Prine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.