Maximo R. Aleman v. Ge Life and Annuity Assurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Maximo R. Aleman v. Ge Life and Annuity Assurance Co.

DecidedFebruary 16, 2006

Docket13-05-00758-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Maximo R. Aleman v. Ge Life and Annuity Assurance Co. (Maximo R. Aleman v. Ge Life and Annuity Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maximo R. Aleman v. Ge Life and Annuity Assurance Co., (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-05-758-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

MAXIMO R. ALEMAN, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

GE LIFE AND ANNUITY ASSURANCE CO., ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, MAXIMO R. ALEMAN, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 04-117-G. Judgment in this cause was signed on December 22, 2003. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellants= notice of appeal was due on January 21, 2004, but was not filed until March 24, 2004. Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants= failure to timely perfect their appeal, appellants= failure to respond to this Court=s notice, and appellees= motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellees= motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 16th day of February, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-05-758-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

MAXIMO R. ALEMAN, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

GE LIFE AND ANNUITY ASSURANCE CO., ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, MAXIMO R. ALEMAN, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 04-117-G. Judgment in this cause was signed on December 22, 2003. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellants= notice of appeal was due on January 21, 2004, but was not filed until March 24, 2004. Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants= failure to timely perfect their appeal, appellants= failure to respond to this Court=s notice, and appellees= motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellees= motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 16th day of February, 2006.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Maximo R. Aleman v. Ge Life and Annuity Assurance Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maximo-r-aleman-v-ge-life-and-annuity-assurance-co-texapp-2006.