Maxim v. Francis
95 A. 786, 114 Me. 547, 1915 Me. LEXIS 37
This text of 95 A. 786 (Maxim v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maxim v. Francis, 95 A. 786, 114 Me. 547, 1915 Me. LEXIS 37 (Me. 1915).
Opinion
This is an action on the case to recover damages for the alleged slander of the plaintiff. The verdict was for the plaintiff, and the case is before this court on a motion to set aside the verdict as against law and evidence.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
95 A. 786, 114 Me. 547, 1915 Me. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxim-v-francis-me-1915.