Maxie v. State
745 S.W.2d 751, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 41, 1988 WL 1010
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant-movant appeals from motion court’s denial of his Rule 27.26 motion which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. Defendant failed to meet his burden of showing prejudice from the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. Motion court’s conclusion and judgment was not clearly erroneous. Sanders v. State, 738 S.W.2d 856, 857 (Mo. banc 1987). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maxie v. State, 745 S.W.2d 751, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 41, 1988 WL 1010 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).
745 S.W.2d 751 (Maxie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas Maxie v. William Webster James A. Gammon
978 F.2d 1264 (Eighth Circuit, 1992)