Maxie v. Beverly Enterprises

Missouri Court of Appeals

Maxie v. Beverly Enterprises

856 S.W.2d 348, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 871, 1993 WL 199108

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 1993·No. No. 62929·Published

Opinion

[349]*349ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s denial of her claim against the Second Injury Fund. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[349]*349ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s denial of her claim against the Second Injury Fund. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Maxie v. Beverly Enterprises, 856 S.W.2d 348, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 871, 1993 WL 199108 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

856 S.W.2d 348 (Maxie v. Beverly Enterprises) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.