Maxfield v. Board of Education
524 A.2d 810, 106 N.J. 538, 1987 N.J. LEXIS 304
Opinions
The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons in the dissenting opinion of Judge Skillman, reported at 217 N.J.Super. 267 (1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maxfield v. Board of Education, 524 A.2d 810, 106 N.J. 538, 1987 N.J. LEXIS 304 (N.J. 1987).
524 A.2d 810 (Maxfield v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division
327 F.2d 944 (Second Circuit, 1964)
Rutherford Education Ass'n v. Board of Education
489 A.2d 1148 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)
Flanigan v. McFeely
120 A.2d 102 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1956)
Spiewak v. Rutherford Bd. of Ed.
447 A.2d 140 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1982)
Spiewak v. Board of Education
434 A.2d 1105 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1981)
Maxfield v. Board of Education of Ridgewood
525 A.2d 727 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Krock v. Electric Motor & Repair Co.
377 U.S. 934 (Supreme Court, 1964)