Maxey v. Cooper

126 S.W. 842, 94 Ark. 296, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 424
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 21, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 126 S.W. 842 (Maxey v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maxey v. Cooper, 126 S.W. 842, 94 Ark. 296, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 424 (Ark. 1910).

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts). The judgment and execution of Cooper Brothers against Mitchell gave them no lien on the buggy. Mortgaged property, where the mortgage has been duly filed, is not subject to execution. Jennings. v. McIlroy, 42 Ark. 236; Buck v. Bransford, 58 Ark. 289, 291. At the time the execution was levied, December 14, 1907, the appellant was the owner of the buggy, having purchased same from Barnes, who purchased of Mitchell December 13, 1907.

Appellant was entitled to a judgment upon the undisputed evidence. The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citizens Bank of Lavaca v. Perrin & Sons, Inc.
488 S.W.2d 14 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1972)
Erdman v. Erdman
159 S.W. 201 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.W. 842, 94 Ark. 296, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxey-v-cooper-ark-1910.