Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited
This text of Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited (Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 23-2285 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 01/15/2025
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MAXELL, LTD., Appellant
v.
AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, Appellee ______________________
2023-2285 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 01442. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JEFFREY TA-HWA HAN, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by CORBIN CESSNA, HILARY L. PRESTON, ERIK SHALLMAN; ERIC JOSEPH KLEIN, PAIGE HOLLAND WRIGHT, Dallas, TX.
KIRK T. BRADLEY, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER TIMOTHY LAWN DOUGLAS, NICHOLAS CHRISTOPHER MARAIS; BRADY COX, Dallas, TX. ______________________ Case: 23-2285 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 01/15/2025
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 15, 2025 Date
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maxell-ltd-v-amperex-technology-limited-cafc-2025.