Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 F.4th 1369
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 15, 2025·No. 23-2285·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-2285 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 01/15/2025

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MAXELL, LTD., Appellant

v.

AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, Appellee ______________________

2023-2285 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021- 01442. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JEFFREY TA-HWA HAN, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by CORBIN CESSNA, HILARY L. PRESTON, ERIK SHALLMAN; ERIC JOSEPH KLEIN, PAIGE HOLLAND WRIGHT, Dallas, TX.

KIRK T. BRADLEY, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER TIMOTHY LAWN DOUGLAS, NICHOLAS CHRISTOPHER MARAIS; BRADY COX, Dallas, TX. ______________________ Case: 23-2285 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 01/15/2025

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 15, 2025 Date

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited, (Fed. Cir. 2025).

Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited (Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.