Max Tendler v. Nick Basiliko
231 F.2d 516, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 357, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3422
Opinion
This appeal, in essence, represents an effort by appellant to obtain relief from the terms of agreements and stipulations which he made as a result of his in *517 volvement in an unfortunate real estate transaction. The questions presented were carefully considered at hearings held before three Judges of the District Court on successive motions of the parties. All concluded that appellant was not entitled to relief. We agree. The judgment appealed from will be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Max Tendler v. Nick Basiliko, 231 F.2d 516, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 357, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3422 (D.C. Cir. 1956).
231 F.2d 516 (Max Tendler v. Nick Basiliko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
T.V.T. Corp. v. Basiliko
257 F.2d 185 (D.C. Circuit, 1958)
Corporation v. Basiliko
257 F.2d 185 (D.C. Circuit, 1958)