Max Schlossberg Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Max Schlossberg Co. v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 449, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 381

United States Customs Court·Decided April 10, 1952·No. No. 56541; protest 151520-K (Detroit)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in controversy at the time of entry consisted of articles of which metal was the component material of chief value and were not ores or concentrates or crude metal; that said articles were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting; and that since entry, said articles were melted and remanufactured by melting. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits have been filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, supra. Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in controversy at the time of entry consisted of articles of which metal was the component material of chief value and were not ores or concentrates or crude metal; that said articles were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting; and that since entry, said articles were melted and remanufactured by melting. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits have been filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, supra. Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Max Schlossberg Co. v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 449, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 381 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

28 Cust. Ct. 449 (Max Schlossberg Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.