Max Rouse & Sons, Inc. v. Specialty Plywood, Inc. (In re Specialty Plywood, Inc.)

Ninth Circuit

Max Rouse & Sons, Inc. v. Specialty Plywood, Inc. (In re Specialty Plywood, Inc.)

166 B.R. 153, 94 Daily Journal DAR 4854, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2581, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 483

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 30, 1994·No. BAP No. CC-92-1321-VPO; Bankruptcy No. SA-91-33159 JW·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF DECISION AND DISMISSAL . OF APPEAL

On November 10, 1993, the Panel filed its decision affirming the trial court. The published opinion is reported as In re Specialty Plywood, Inc., 160 B.R. 627 (9th Cir. BAP 1993). A notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was filed on November 19, 1993. Subsequently, the parties reached a settlement. The panel has reviewed the Appellant’s Report on Remand and Motion For Order To Approve Settlement and Vacate Opinion, together with a copy of the trial judge’s Order Approving Settlement and Vacating Decision Previously Published, which was entered on March 28, 1994.

When a controversy is settled during the pendency of an appeal, it is generally recognized that the lower courts should vacate their decisions. See, Continental Cas. Co. v. Fibreboard Corp., 4 F.3d 777, 779-80 (9th [154] Cir.1993); and In re Tucson Industrial Partners, 990 F.2d 1099 (9th Cir.1993). As the appeal to the Ninth Circuit has been dismissed based on settlement and the settlement agreement has been approved by the bankruptcy trial judge, the Appellant’s motion is hereby ORDERED GRANTED and the Panel’s opinion decision is hereby ORDERED WITHDRAWN.

FURTHER, the appeal is ORDERED DISMISSED. A certified copy of this order sent to the Bankruptcy Court shall constitute the mandate of the Panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF DECISION AND DISMISSAL . OF APPEAL

On November 10, 1993, the Panel filed its decision affirming the trial court. The published opinion is reported as In re Specialty Plywood, Inc., 160 B.R. 627 (9th Cir. BAP 1993). A notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was filed on November 19, 1993. Subsequently, the parties reached a settlement. The panel has reviewed the Appellant’s Report on Remand and Motion For Order To Approve Settlement and Vacate Opinion, together with a copy of the trial judge’s Order Approving Settlement and Vacating Decision Previously Published, which was entered on March 28, 1994.

When a controversy is settled during the pendency of an appeal, it is generally recognized that the lower courts should vacate their decisions. See, Continental Cas. Co. v. Fibreboard Corp., 4 F.3d 777, 779-80 (9th [154] Cir.1993); and In re Tucson Industrial Partners, 990 F.2d 1099 (9th Cir.1993). As the appeal to the Ninth Circuit has been dismissed based on settlement and the settlement agreement has been approved by the bankruptcy trial judge, the Appellant’s motion is hereby ORDERED GRANTED and the Panel’s opinion decision is hereby ORDERED WITHDRAWN.

FURTHER, the appeal is ORDERED DISMISSED. A certified copy of this order sent to the Bankruptcy Court shall constitute the mandate of the Panel.

Max Rouse & Sons, Inc. v. Specialty Plywood, Inc. (In re Specialty Plywood, Inc.), 166 B.R. 153, 94 Daily Journal DAR 4854, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2581, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 483 (bap9 1994).

Pincite

166 B.R. 153 (Max Rouse & Sons, Inc. v. Specialty Plywood, Inc. (In re Specialty Plywood, Inc.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related