Max Rouse & Sons, Inc. v. Specialty Plywood, Inc. (In re Specialty Plywood, Inc.)

166 B.R. 153, 94 Daily Journal DAR 4854, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2581, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 483
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 30, 1994
DocketBAP No. CC-92-1321-VPO; Bankruptcy No. SA-91-33159 JW
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 166 B.R. 153 (Max Rouse & Sons, Inc. v. Specialty Plywood, Inc. (In re Specialty Plywood, Inc.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Max Rouse & Sons, Inc. v. Specialty Plywood, Inc. (In re Specialty Plywood, Inc.), 166 B.R. 153, 94 Daily Journal DAR 4854, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2581, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 483 (bap9 1994).

Opinion

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF DECISION AND DISMISSAL . OF APPEAL

On November 10, 1993, the Panel filed its decision affirming the trial court. The published opinion is reported as In re Specialty Plywood, Inc., 160 B.R. 627 (9th Cir. BAP 1993). A notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was filed on November 19, 1993. Subsequently, the parties reached a settlement. The panel has reviewed the Appellant’s Report on Remand and Motion For Order To Approve Settlement and Vacate Opinion, together with a copy of the trial judge’s Order Approving Settlement and Vacating Decision Previously Published, which was entered on March 28, 1994.

When a controversy is settled during the pendency of an appeal, it is generally recognized that the lower courts should vacate their decisions. See, Continental Cas. Co. v. Fibreboard Corp., 4 F.3d 777, 779-80 (9th [154]*154Cir.1993); and In re Tucson Industrial Partners, 990 F.2d 1099 (9th Cir.1993). As the appeal to the Ninth Circuit has been dismissed based on settlement and the settlement agreement has been approved by the bankruptcy trial judge, the Appellant’s motion is hereby ORDERED GRANTED and the Panel’s opinion decision is hereby ORDERED WITHDRAWN.

FURTHER, the appeal is ORDERED DISMISSED. A certified copy of this order sent to the Bankruptcy Court shall constitute the mandate of the Panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Walker Land & Cattle, LLC
535 B.R. 348 (D. Idaho, 2015)
In Re Borders Group, Inc.
456 B.R. 195 (S.D. New York, 2011)
In Re Computer Learning Centers, Inc.
285 B.R. 191 (E.D. Virginia, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 B.R. 153, 94 Daily Journal DAR 4854, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2581, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/max-rouse-sons-inc-v-specialty-plywood-inc-in-re-specialty-plywood-bap9-1994.