Max Rack, Inc. v. Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Max Rack, Inc. v. Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 10, 2011

Docket2010-1417

StatusUnpublished

This text of Max Rack, Inc. v. Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. (Max Rack, Inc. v. Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Max Rack, Inc. v. Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MAX RACK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HOIST FITNESS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2010-1417 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in No. 05-CV-0784, Judge Michael H. Watson. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JEFFREY S. STANDLEY, Standley Law Group, LLP, of Dublin, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were JAMES L. KWAK, F. MICHAEL SPEED, JR. and MICHAEL R. STONEBROOK.

SUSAN B. MEYER, Gordon & Rees, LLP, of San Diego, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was JOHN L. HALLER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and DYK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 10, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI