Max Millet and Dora Millet v. United States
This text of 287 F.2d 409 (Max Millet and Dora Millet v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
287 F.2d 409
Max MILLET and Dora Millet, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 283, Docket 26704.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Feb. 20, 1961.
Decided March 23, 1961.
Louis Granick, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Richard S. Harrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Cornelius W. Wickersham, Jr., U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before HINCKS and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and BRENNAN, Cistrict Judge.1
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion below, 189 F.Supp. 88.
Sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 F.2d 409, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 5023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/max-millet-and-dora-millet-v-united-states-ca2-1961.