Max Janis v. United States of America

540 F.2d 1022, 39 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 77
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 2, 1976·No. 73-2226·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION ON REMAND

PER CURIAM:

In an unpublished Memorandum, we affirmed the District Court’s judgment upon the specified and expressed basis “of the District Court’s very carefully written Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law . .” The Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed our judgment, and remanded the cause to our Court. Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s mandate, which we have now received, we now remand the cause to the District Court for further proceedings conforming with the Supreme Court’s opinion. United States v. Janis, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3021, 49 L.Ed.2d -(1976).

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Max Janis v. United States of America, 540 F.2d 1022, 39 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 77 (9th Cir. 1976).

540 F.2d 1022 (Max Janis v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elliott v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
701 S.W.2d 462 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1985)