Max Jakob, Ltd. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Max Jakob, Ltd. v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 594

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1958

DocketReap. Dec. 9270; Entry Nos. 760833; 784421; 775114

StatusPublished

This text of 41 Cust. Ct. 594 (Max Jakob, Ltd. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Max Jakob, Ltd. v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 594 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, [595]*595were called for bearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, [595]*595were called for bearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Cust. Ct. 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/max-jakob-ltd-v-united-states-cusc-1958.