Max Elliott Ray v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 26, 2014·No. 03-13-00085-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 26, 2014

NO. 03-13-00085-CR

Max Elliott Ray, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART – OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the judgment of

conviction except the portion imposing sentence. Therefore, the Court affirms that portion of the

district court’s judgment regarding conviction, but reverses that portion of the district court’s

judgment imposing sentence and remands the case to the district court for a new punishment

hearing. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Max Elliott Ray v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Max Elliott Ray v. State (Max Elliott Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.