Max Elliott Ray v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 26, 2014
NO. 03-13-00085-CR
Max Elliott Ray, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART – OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the judgment of
conviction except the portion imposing sentence. Therefore, the Court affirms that portion of the
district court’s judgment regarding conviction, but reverses that portion of the district court’s
judgment imposing sentence and remands the case to the district court for a new punishment
hearing. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Max Elliott Ray v. State (Max Elliott Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.